Newsletter Vol.2, #17—May 7, 2006

 

Matthew 8 17This was to fulfill what was spoken by the prophet Isaiah: "He took our illnesses and bore our diseases." 18Now when Jesus saw a great crowd around him, he gave orders to go over to the other side.

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

            May 1st                                                            May 12th

 

The Sin-Sick Soul

by Robert F. Turner

I had occasion recently to visit a modern State prison, and had an interesting visit with the Chief Warden. Unlike the old time jailer, this man was a doctor of psychology, with graduate work and much experience in penology. He studied the behavior patterns of criminals and miscreants; analyzing, differentiating, seeking for causes and cures.

One of his statements struck me with great force. "We can deal with the psychotic with drugs -- put the mind in a state of neutrality -- analyze -- block out undesirable traumas; but, with the sociopath, we can only apply a combination of matters (religion, a job -- to give self-respect, and the like) and maybe we can move the patient in the right direction."

I'll try to translate this into Plain Talk -- but make allowance for my non-professional, layman concepts. He was saying that we can work on the mind, like an IBM machine. Mechanically we block off a section, repair the "short" or remove cross-purpose elements; but the moral character -- shall I say, the soul -- is different. We can only set desirable goals before the soul -- be patient; seek to motivate, move in the right direction.

The mind of man is sometimes closely associated with his "spirit" or the "inner man" (Rom. 7:18-f) though complicated and intricate, yet has certain measurable and predictable functions. A "sick" mind can, in many respects, be treated mechanically. We may discover a "traumatic" (wounding) experience in the patient's past, and lead the patient in a rational detour of this injury.

Or by drugs, and some suggest by surgery, we may remove or seal off the scar. But there is more to the inner man than a "natural" IBM machine. What can be done for a man whose conscience is seared? Who has lost, or destroyed, his sense of moral right? An impenitent sinner??

The doctor calls this man "sociopath" and defines this as "inferior for undetermined reasons." The doctor is a sociologist and tends to think of the man only as he relates to mankind, or society. But I could not forget the man's relation to his Maker. I saw the patient as not only out of touch with his fellow man, but also (and more important) out of touch with God. And, to me, God is not a social development, but Eternal Deity -- existing prior to man, creating man even as the potter works with clay (Read carefully Rom. 1:18-32; 9:16-23).

When man fails to "glorify" God, mindful of His constant august presence, and is not "thankful," recognizing his dependence upon God, then he is cut free to drift upon purely human (social) standards. "God also gave them up to uncleanness...unto vile affections...over to a reprobate mind" (Rom. 1:24, 26, 28) (See Vol. 5, No. 4, p 5 Plain Talk).

I was happy to hear that the Warden recognized "religion" as a motivating force for good. But if this "religion" is nothing more than a facet of society, it is doomed as a cure. The soul that is sick will respond to nothing short of the Great Physician. We must recognize SIN as SIN, and get forgiveness in Jesus Christ. -- Via Plain Talk, Vol. 5, No. 7, September 1968

 

Legalism: The Un-Sin

by Steve Klein

Since the church began, the devil has concocted any number of diabolical schemes to ensnare God's people. One of his most successful gambits has been the invention of the pseudo-sin commonly called legalism. More people consider legalism to be a sin than consider 7-up to be a cola, but they are all mistaken. Legalism is the un-sin.

Legalism is defined as "strict, literal or excessive conformity to the law or to a religious or moral code" (Webster's Dictionary). Simply put, a legalist follows the rules.

I was not there when the devil and his angels dreamed up this strategy for getting Christians to commit more sin by convincing them that legalism is a sin. But I must say that it was a stroke of genius. Just think of it -- being able to actually convince people that not committing sin is a sin!

Satan must have noticed that early disciples "continued steadfastly in the apostles doctrine" (Acts 2:42), and that they were expected to be "obedient in all things" (2 Corinthians 2:9). At some point however, Satan also became aware that the apostles and prophets of Christ were teaching Jewish Christians that they could not rely on their obedience to the Law of Moses for their salvation; it would do them no good to strictly follow the Law of Moses. And that's when Satan hatched his scheme. He knew that if he could convince Christians that the apostolic warnings against becoming "entangled again with a yoke of bondage" (Galatians 5:1) were talking about strictly keeping the commands of Jesus, then he could get them to stop being concerned with commandment keeping.

This is what has happened. Millions of people today who call themselves Christians believe that strict obedience to God is a sin called legalism. They believe that to be a faithful Christian one must not be too concerned with actually doing exactly what Jesus said to do. Their leaders write things like the following:

"Stringently striving to obey Christian rules and regulations doesn't enable the Spirit-filled walk; it often kills it" (2 Corinthians 3:6). [Neil Anderson, Freed from Legalism].

Please note that in the verse cited by this anti-legalist, the apostle Paul states that God "made us sufficient as ministers of the new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life." What is "the letter" in this passage? Is it "Christian rules and regulations" as Mr. Anderson states? We don't have to guess, for Paul tells us in the next verse. The letter that kills is called "the ministry of death, written and engraved on stones" (2 Corinthians 2:7). "The letter" is plainly the Law of Moses! It was written on tablets of stone.

Over and over again the apostles of Christ warn that striving to strictly follow the Law of Moses will lead to death, not life! But nowhere do they state that strictly following the commands of Christ will do the same.

The New Testament never condemns the strict keeping of the commandments of God. It always commends it. Even the hair-splitting, herb-tithing, commandment-keeping Pharisees were not condemned for keeping God's commandments too well. They were condemned for keeping the small requirements while leaving off the big ones. Jesus told them that they should have kept both! "These you ought to have done, without leaving the others undone" (Matthew 23:23).

My friends, those who love God will keep His commandments. "For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments. And His commandments are not burdensome" (1 John 5:3). Those who don't keep God's commandments, don't really know Him. "Now by this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. He who says, "I know Him," and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him" (1 John 2:3-4).

-- Via The Bulletin of the Church of Christ at New Georgia, 3-19-2006